Skip to content
Compliance The standards we encode

Defensibility,
convenience and assurance.

Four water-risk scopes on one platform — Legionella, damp & mould, scald & TMV, escape of water. Three carry legal duties (Awaab's Law sets the only true statutory clock); the fourth is insurer-driven. We don't replace your duty — we make it provable. The framework we encode, by scope:

Why our approach to compliance

Defensibility

A continuous, tamper-evident record across every site — the kind of evidence that holds up to a regulator's question, an insurer's request, or a court's scrutiny.

Convenience

One operating system. No spreadsheets, no chasing contractors, no reconstructing a paper trail after the fact. Compliance work that used to mean phone calls now runs on rails.

Assurance

Weekly hashed compliance certificates, by site, by portfolio. The duty holder, the FM lead, the insurer and the inspector all read from the same record.

01 · Legal — universal

Legionella

Legal duty to assess and control the risk under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and COSHH 2002; ACoP L8 sets the standard and HSG274 the technical guidance, with frequency set by the risk assessment, not a fixed interval.

HSWA 1974 · COSHH 2002

The legal duty itself

Statute

Duty to control the Legionella risk so far as reasonably practicable, with a named responsible person and written risk assessment, reviewed when no longer valid.

How we encode it: ACoP L8 written scheme auto-populated from sensor data; responsible person tied to every event.

ACOP L8

Legionnaires' disease — Approved Code of Practice

Aligned

Sets the standard by which the HSWA/COSHH duty is judged — follow it for presumed compliance, or show an equally effective alternative.

How we encode it: sentinel-outlet readings logged every 15 minutes; annual ACoP L8 risk assessment bundled in.

HSG274 PARTS 1–3

Technical guidance — recommended cadences

Encoded

HSE guidance covering evaporative cooling (Part 1), hot & cold water systems (Part 2) and other risk systems (Part 3); its frequencies are recommendations the risk assessment adopts or beats, not statutory intervals.

How we encode it: hot loop ≥ 55 °C, cold ≤ 20 °C, TMV blend 41–46 °C, checked every 15 minutes; flushes, descales and calorifier inspections tracked.

WMS PART 2 (May 2024)

Water Management Strategy — IoT continuous monitoring

Substitute

The 2024 endorsement of IoT continuous monitoring as a substitute for elements of manual Legionella inspection — the permission layer for what BlueMetric does.

How we encode it: sensor density and cadence designed against WMS Part 2 substitution criteria.

HTM 04-01 PARTS A–C

Safe water in healthcare premises

Healthcare uplift

Department of Health Technical Memorandum 04-01 for Healthcare, CQC-registered care homes and augmented-care areas — distribution ≥ 55 °C with tighter sentinel coverage.

How we encode it: HTM 04-01 thresholds enforced on high-acuity bands; ward-level reporting; CQC-aligned evidence packs.

ISO 11731

Water quality — enumeration of Legionella

Partner lab

The international standard for Legionella sampling and lab analysis; sampling is risk-based, not routine for temperature-controlled systems unless control is in doubt. Performed by our accredited partner laboratory.

How we encode it: sampling triggered when the risk assessment requires it; chain-of-custody hashed end-to-end.

Cooling Towers Regs 1992

Notification of cooling towers & evaporative condensers

Notifiable

Cooling towers and evaporative condensers are notifiable to the local authority — a higher-risk pathway in HSG274 Part 1 with a tighter monitoring and treatment regime.

How we encode it: cooling-tower assets tagged and notification status tracked; tighter sensor cadence and dosing applied.

BREEAM WAT-04

Water — Legionella risk reporting

Reporting included

BREEAM In-Use credit for continuous Legionella monitoring evidence — often relevant for residential, PBSA and healthcare REIT reporting.

How we encode it: BREEAM WAT-04 reporting pack exported on request with hashes and timestamps.
02 · Legal — rented housing

Damp & mould

The one scope with a true statutory clock — but only for social housing, via Awaab's Law (in force 27 October 2025); the PRS carries a fit-for-habitation duty and workplaces a general HSWA duty, with continuous humidity sensing starting the clock.

AWAAB'S LAW

Hazards in Social Housing (Prescribed Requirements) (England) Regs 2025

Statutory clock

From 27/10/2025, on becoming aware of a damp/mould hazard a social landlord must investigate within 10 working days, report to the resident within 3 working days, begin remedial action within 5 working days, and make safe within 24 hours for an emergency. Sits within s.10A Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

How we encode it: continuous RH and dew-point monitoring; statutory countdown clocks on each investigate / report / remediate step.

HHSRS

Housing Health & Safety Rating System (Housing Act 2004)

All rented stock

Damp & mould is a Category 1 hazard under HHSRS where serious risk is present — enforced by local authorities across all rented housing, social and private.

How we encode it: HHSRS Category 1 thresholds in the alerting; evidence pack ready for local-authority engagement.

FFHH ACT 2018

Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act

PRS outcome duty

Applies to all PRS tenancies from 20/03/2020 — the dwelling must be fit for human habitation throughout, free from serious HHSRS hazards including damp and mould.

How we encode it: the same continuous humidity record supplies PRS evidence that conditions were monitored and acted on.

WORKPLACE REGS 1992

Ventilation — commercial & industrial

Outcome duty

Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regs 1992, reg.6 (ventilation) and reg.9 (cleanliness); a general HSWA s.2/s.3 duty to control health risks, with no fixed frequency.

How we encode it: sustained-high-RH and dew-point alerts, with a ventilation-adequacy proxy where CO₂ sensing is fitted.
03 · Legal — sector-conditional

Scald & TMV

The mirror image of Legionella — hot at the loop, cool at the outlet, resolved by thermostatic mixing valves. No single statute sets a servicing frequency; it comes from Building Regs, care standards (CQC, HTM 04-01), and the TMV2 / TMV3 scheme.

BUILDING REGS · APPROVED DOC G3

Hot water safety — new dwellings

Statute (new work)

New dwellings must limit hot water at a bath outlet to a safe maximum — bath fill ≤ 48 °C, the highest scald-injury route.

How we encode it: bath-outlet thermal-control devices verified at install; outlet temperature monitored continuously to spec.

HTM 04-01 PART B

TMV verification in healthcare

Healthcare

For healthcare premises, NHS HTM 04-01 Part B sets the TMV verification regime — re-test ~ 6–8 weeks then ~ 12–15 weeks after commissioning, then ≥ annually if stable.

How we encode it: outlet-temperature checks and the fail-safe (cold shut-off) test logged each visit, by risk band.

HSCA REG 12 · CQC

Safe care and treatment

Safe-care duty

Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regs 2014, reg.12 — providers must mitigate risks to service-user safety; bath water above ~ 44 °C is a scald risk for vulnerable users, with assisted bathing around 41 °C.

How we encode it: outlet-temperature events tagged to care settings; CQC-aligned evidence pack on demand.

TMV2 · TMV3 SCHEME

Thermostatic mixing valve servicing standards

Industry scheme

TMV2 (domestic) and TMV3 (healthcare) set commissioning, in-service testing and the fail-safe (cold shut-off) test regime; annual is the common baseline, tightened in healthcare and vulnerable settings.

How we encode it: TMV asset register per site; commissioning baseline and annual fail-safe test logged.
04 · Commercial — universal

Escape of water

The odd one out — no Approved Code of Practice or housing statute sets an inspection clock; the requirement comes from insurer policy conditions, lease repairing covenants, and Building Regs, with leak detection and automatic isolation increasingly insurer-mandated on high-cascade assets.

INSURER POLICY CONDITIONS

Leak detection & isolation warranties

Primary driver

Insurers increasingly require active leak detection, accessible isolation valves and inspection regimes on high-value assets; breaching a policy warranty can reduce or void cover.

How we encode it: continuous pressure and flow monitoring on plant rooms and risers; auto shut-off events logged.

LEASE REPAIRING COVENANTS

Landlord / tenant inspection duty

Contractual

Repairing covenants in commercial leases are the practical source of an inspection duty in let property — periodic checks of concealed pipework, plant rooms and risers, tighter on multi-tenant high-rise.

How we encode it: inspection cadence per asset profile; isolation-valve testing scheduled and sealed into the chain.

BUILDING REGS · DOCS H & G

Drainage and water — new work / alteration

At build

Approved Documents H (drainage) and G (water) apply at construction and alteration, not as an ongoing inspection cycle — compliance at install, with an inspection regime on top.

How we encode it: as-installed pressure and flow baselines captured; drift flagged as a leak-risk signal.

DEFECTIVE PREMISES ACT

Duty of care — loss caused by leaks

Common-law backdrop

Negligence and the Defective Premises Act 1972 bite where a leak causes loss or harm; a continuous record of detection and response is the evidence of duty discharged.

How we encode it: every leak event paired with detection time, dispatch time and remediation outcome.

Escape of water is not a statutory mandate; it is an insurance and commercial obligation.

Cross-scope

The framework that sits over all four

A handful of duties bite across every scope — and they're where a tamper-evident continuous record earns its keep most plainly.

HSWA 1974 · S.37

Personal liability of officers

Defensible record

The Health and Safety at Work Act's "reasonably practicable" test moves with industry practice — continuous monitoring is the rising institutional baseline, lifting the manual-check floor with it.

How we encode it: continuous, immutable record showing what was measured and acted on, tamper-evident at the file level.

COSHH 2002

Control of Substances Hazardous to Health

Cross-cuts

Legionella is a biological hazard under COSHH; biocide dosing and damp/mould cleaning regimes engage COSHH wherever active substances are used.

How we encode it: COSHH events sealed into the chain; technicians' COSHH credentials verified at vetting.

EVIDENCE STANDARDS

Records that survive challenge

Defensibility

Civil Evidence Act 1995, PACE 1984 and the "reasonably practicable" standard all reward a contemporaneous, tamper-evident record authenticated end-to-end.

How we encode it: every reading SHA-256 hashed, GPS-locked and chained; root publishable for third-party verification.

Relevant assessments and tests apply per scope, where applicable — e.g. ACoP L8 risk assessment (Legionella), TMV service and fail-safe test (scald), damp/mould assessment for social housing, and leak/flow monitoring (escape of water).

Map your estate to the standards.

Tell us about your estate. We'll book an intro call and take it from there.